Live birth rate following frozen–thawed blastocyst transfer
CredoMedia Romania
CredoMedia Romania
Pagină
Live birth rate following frozen–thawed blastocyst transfer

Live birth rate following frozen–thawed blastocyst transfer

Live birth rate is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the live birth rate (LBR) after frozen-thawed Day 5 (D5) and Day 6 (D6) blastocyst transfers.

 

SUMMARY ANSWER

LBR following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is significantly lower with D6 than with D5 blastocyst regardless of embryo quality.

 

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

During new embryo transfer cycles, pregnancy rates (PR) are significantly higher when transferring blastocysts expanded on D5 compared to slow developing blastocysts (D6). In programmed thawed blastocyst transfer (TBT) cycles, the same clinical outcomes should be expected when transferring D5 or D6 blastocysts due to endometrial / embryonic synchronization due to hormonal priming of endometrial receptivity. However, the impact of delayed blastocyst expansion on D6 on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Some reports have shown higher PRs after D5 TBT compared to those of D6, while others have shown equivalent TBT outcomes after D5 and D6 cryopreserved blastocysts transfers.

 

STUDY, DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This retrospective cohort follow-up study included 1347 single autologous frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers performed between January 2012 and December 2015 at a tertiary care university hospital.

 

PARTICIPANTS / MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All of the patients scheduled for TBT were assigned to two groups according to the day of blastocyst expansion: on D5 ( n  = 994) or on D6 ( n  = 353). The primary outcome was LBR per embryo transfer in the first blastocyst thawing cycle. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), early miscarriage rate and neonatal outcomes following TBT for the two groups. Statistical analyzes were conducted using a univariate and multivariate logistic regression model.

 

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The LBR was significantly increased in the D5 group compared to the D6 group [294/994 (29.6%) versus 60/353 (17.0%); P &  lt; 0.001]. The cPR was also higher when blastocysts were vitrified on D5 compared to those vitrified on D6 [429/994 (43.2%) versus 95/353 (26.9%); P &  lt; 0.001]. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of early miscarriage rate ( P  = 0.862). More good-quality embryos (defined as a B3-B4 or B5 embryo ≥BB according to the grading scale proposed by Gardner) were transferred in the D5 group than in the D6 group [807 (81.2%) versus 214 (60.6%); P <0.001]. However, a comparison of TBT cycles with equal embryo quality (good versus low) also supported the superiority of D5 blastocysts. Concerning neonatal outcomes, the D5 group had a lower mean birth weight compared to those of the D6 group ( P  = 0.001). In addition, a significantly shorter gestational age at birth is reported in the D5 blastocyst group compared to the D6 group ( P  = 0.004). After multivariate logistic regression, taking into account potential confounders such as women's age, number of previous IVF / ICSI procedures, day of blastocyst vitrification (D5 or D6) and embryo quality, blastocyst expansion at D6 was independently associated with a significant decrease in LBR compared to D5 expanded-blastocysts (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.38-0.72; P &  lt; 0.001).

 

 

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The poor predictive value of the morphological approach in embryo selection could be a limitation in this study. However, blastocyst quality was similarly evaluated in both groups.

 

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The LBR following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer was significantly lower with D6 than with D5 blastocysts, regardless of their quality. These results could affect cryopreservation procedures as they suggest that the use of D5-expanded blastocysts for TBT may be preferable in order to shorten the time of conceiving.

 

STUDY FUNDING / COMPETING INTEREST (S)

No specific funding has been obtained for this study. None of the authors have any competitive interests to declare.

 

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

 

Read the whole article at Human Reproduction

Comentarii